Admin MPS / četrtek, 11. avgust 2022 / Categories: Aktualno EU zakonodaja - CELEX CELEX:32014L0055R(02): Rectificatif à la directive 2014/55/UE du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 16 avril 2014 relative à la facturation électronique dans le cadre des marchés publics («Journal officiel de l’Union européenne» L 133 du 6 mai 2014) The corrigendum does not concern the English version. CELEX:32014L0053R(03): Rectificatif à la directive 2014/53/UE du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 16 avril 2014 relative à l’harmonisation des législations des États membres concernant la mise à disposition sur le marché d’équipements radioélectriques et abrogeant la directive 1999/5/CE (JO L 153 du 22.5.2014) CELEX:32014L0059R(16) Print 28 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62024CJ0409_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#J-GmbH and D v Finanzamt K and Finanzamt F.#References for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 98 – Option for the Member States to apply a reduced rate of VAT to certain supplies of goods and services – Short-term accommodation in hotels and similar establishments – Annex III, point (12) – Reduced rate of VAT applicable to accommodation provided in hotels and similar establishments – Supplies that are ancillary to accommodation – National regulations establishing a mechanism for separating taxable transactions – No application of the reduced VAT rate to supplies that are not directly used for the accommodation – Principle of fiscal neutrality.#Joined C CELEX:62024TO0267_RES: Ordonnance du Tribunal (quatrième chambre, siégeant avec cinq juges) du 26 février 2026.#Christofer Edge contre Banque européenne d'investissement.#Recours en annulation – Fonction publique – Personnel de la BEI – Délai de recours – Article 41a du règlement du personnel de la BEI – Computation des délais – Irrecevabilité.#Affaire T-267/24. CELEX:62024CJ0367_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#Autoritatea Naţională pentru Administrare şi Reglementare în Comunicaţii v Telekom România Mobile Communications.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic communications – Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 – Measures concerning open internet access – Article 3(3) – Obligation on providers of internet access services to treat traffic equally and without discrimination, restriction or interference – Possibility, for those providers, to implement reasonable traffic management measures – Tariff option entailing a bandwidth limitation in respect of video streaming.#Case C-367/24. CELEX:62024CJ0436: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Skatteverket v Lyko Operations AB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 30a – Supply of goods – Concept of ‘voucher’ – Classification – Customer loyalty programme in the form of points awarded on the basis of previous purchases – Points which may be redeemed for products of low value.#Case C-436/24. CELEX:62024CJ0457: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Romania v European Commission.#Appeal – Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) – European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/2020 – Expenditure excluded from European Union financing – Expenditure incurred by Romania – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Article 52 – Conformity clearance procedure – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 908/2014 – Article 34 – Change in the legal basis of the European Commission’s proposals for financial corrections – Possibility for the Member State concerned to make its views on those proposals known in a meaningful way – Concept of ‘external factor’ – Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Article 44 – Diversif CELEX:62024CJ0151: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) v V. M.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/98/EU – Rights for third-country workers who hold a single permit – Article 12 – Right to equal treatment – Third-country national – Residence permit for family reasons – Social security – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Coordination of social security systems – Article 3 – Concept of ‘branches of social security’ – Article 70 – Special non-contributory cash benefits – Social allowance for the elderly living in indigence – Conditions for granting – Exclusion of third-country nationals who do not hold an EU residence permit for long-term residents.#Case C-151/24. CELEX:62025CC0070: Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 5 March 2026.### CELEX:62025CC0819: Conclusions de l'avocat général M. R. Norkus, présentées le 5 mars 2026.### CELEX:62024CO0745_SUM: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb eV v GLOBUS Handelshof GmbH & Co. KG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Saarbrücken.#Case C-745/24. CELEX:62024CJ0409: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#J-GmbH and D v Finanzamt K and Finanzamt F.#References for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 98 – Option for the Member States to apply a reduced rate of VAT to certain supplies of goods and services – Short-term accommodation in hotels and similar establishments – Annex III, point (12) – Reduced rate of VAT applicable to accommodation provided in hotels and similar establishments – Supplies that are ancillary to accommodation – National regulations establishing a mechanism for separating taxable transactions – No application of the reduced VAT rate to supplies that are not directly used for the accommodation – Principle of fiscal neutrality.#Joined Cases CELEX:62024CJ0309: Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 5 mars 2026.#Roberto Passalacqua contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Fonctionnaire – Promotion – Exercice de promotion 2021 – Décision de ne pas promouvoir le requérant au grade AD 11 – Article 45, paragraphe 1, du statut des fonctionnaires de l’Union européenne – Comparaison des mérites – Obligation de motivation – Répartition de la charge de la preuve.#Affaire C-309/24 P. CELEX:62024CJ0613: Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 5 mars 2026.#Commission européenne contre République portugaise.#Manquement d’État – Article 260, paragraphe 2, TFUE – Arrêt de la Cour constatant un manquement – Environnement – Directive 92/43/CEE – Faune et flore sauvages – Conservation des habitats naturels ainsi que de la faune et de la flore sauvages – Article 4, paragraphe 4 – Annexes I et II – Sites d’importance communautaire – Zones spéciales de conservation – Absence de désignation – Article 6, paragraphe 1 – Mesures de conservation nécessaires – Absence d’adoption – Inexécution de l’arrêt de la Cour – Sanctions pécuniaires – Somme forfaitaire – Astreinte.#Affaire C-613/24. CELEX:62024CJ0458_RES: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#DO v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Article 3(2) – Article 29 – Transfer of the asylum seeker to the Member State responsible for examining the application for international protection – Suspension, by the Member State responsible, of the taking charge and taking back of asylum seekers – Directive (EU) 2013/32 – Article 33 – Inadmissible applications.#Case C-458/24. CELEX:62024CJ0539_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 November 2025.#Mikroregion Porta Bohemica v Odvolací finanční ředitelství.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 – Concept of ‘irregularity’ – Article 1(2) – Limitation periods – Article 3 – Starting point and duration of the limitation periods – Project co-financed through EU resources.#Case C-539/24. CELEX:62023CJ0422_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#T.B. and Others v T. S.A. and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Effective judicial protection in fields covered by EU law – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Principles of the irremovability and independence of judges – Non-consensual designation of a judge of a supreme court to sit, for a specified period, in another chamber of that court – Primacy of EU law – Public procurement – Directive 2004/17/EC – Procurement procedures – Application to an agreement for the transfer of ownership rights relating to green electricity certificates of origin – Directive 92/13/EEC – Article 2d(1) – Review procedures in relation to the CELEX:62024CJ0472: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#MB "Žaidimų valiuta" v Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Exemptions – Article 135(1)(e) – Transactions involving the exchange of units of virtual money of an online video game for traditional currencies – Calculation of the taxable amount – Article 30a – Multi-purpose vouchers – Virtual money of an online video game.#Case C-472/24. CELEX:62024CJ0210: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Asociación de Empresas de Servicios para la Dependencia (AESTE) v Ayuntamiento de Ortuella.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Contract for social services without accommodation – Contract with a value below the threshold for that directive to apply – Article 67 – Award criteria of a social nature – Most economically advantageous tender – Salary increase of staff performing the contract above the salary level provided for in the sectoral collective agreement – Connection with the subject matter of the contract – Proportionality and non-discrimination – Article 28 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to negotiate by collective agreement.#Case CELEX:62024CJ0150: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#A v Rikoskomisario B.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Immigration policy – Common standards and procedures for returning illegally staying third-country nationals – Directive 2008/115/EC – Detention for the purpose of removal – Article 15(5) and (6) – Calculation of the length of the detention already completed – Aggregation of all of the previous periods of detention – Conditions – Enforcement of one and the same return decision – Second sentence of Article 15(3) – Prolonged detention beyond the initial maximum period laid down under Article 15(5) – Review by a judicial authority – National legislation making the implementation of that review contingent on an application by the detained person – Point in time CELEX:62024CC0575: Opinion of Advocate General Norkus delivered on 5 March 2026.### CELEX:62024CJ0150_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#A v Rikoskomisario B.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Immigration policy – Common standards and procedures for returning illegally staying third-country nationals – Directive 2008/115/EC – Detention for the purpose of removal – Article 15(5) and (6) – Calculation of the length of the detention already completed – Aggregation of all of the previous periods of detention – Conditions – Enforcement of one and the same return decision – Second sentence of Article 15(3) – Prolonged detention beyond the initial maximum period laid down under Article 15(5) – Review by a judicial authority – National legislation making the implementation of that review contingent on an application by the detained person – Point in t Comments are only visible to subscribers.