Related articles

• CELEX:62024TJ0628: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Lego A/S v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a building block from a toy building set – Earlier EU design – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – No different overall impression – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-628/24.
• CELEX:62025TJ0064_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Lisa Leone and Others v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Leone – Relative ground for invalidity – Right to an earlier name under Austrian law – Article 60(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-64/25.
• CELEX:62024TJ0232: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Euro Asia Cargo Private Ltd v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibitions relating to dual-use goods and technology – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the prohibitions – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Annex IV to Decision (CFSP) 2014/512 and Annex IV to Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Freedom to conduct a business.#Case T-232/24.
• CELEX:62025TJ0140:           Urteil des Gerichts (Achte Kammer) vom 14. Januar 2026.#Variuscard Produktions- und Handels GmbH gegen Amt der Europäischen Union für geistiges Eigentum.#Unionsmarke – Anmeldung der Unionswortmarke CRYPTOSTAMP – Absolutes Eintragungshindernis – Beschreibender Charakter – Art. 7 Abs. 1 Buchst. c der Verordnung (EU) 2017/1001 – Gleichbehandlung – Grundsatz der guten Verwaltung.#Rechtssache T-140/25.
• CELEX:62024TJ0517: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Froneri Bulgaria EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a box with a lid – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Different overall impression – Novelty – Articles 5 and 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822.#Case T-517/24.
• CELEX:62024TJ0308:           Arrêt du Tribunal (huitième chambre) du 14 janvier 2026.#Engie Energie Services contre Parlement européen.#Marchés publics de services – Procédure d’appel d’offres – Conduite et maintenance des installations techniques des bâtiments du Parlement à Strasbourg – Rejet de l’offre d’un soumissionnaire et attribution du marché à un autre soumissionnaire – Conformité de l’offre avec les exigences minimales – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation.#Affaire T-308/24.
• CELEX:62025TO0281(01)_INF: Order of the President of the General Court of 7 August 2025.#JB v European Union Agency for the Space Programme.#Interim relief – Public procurement – Exclusion from award procedures governed by Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 and from being selected to implement Union funds and the imposition of a financial penalty – Publication of information – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – Prima facie case – Urgency – Balancing of competing interests.#Case T-281/25 R.
• CELEX:62025TJ0230: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Ionfarma, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark DESMOMED – Prior national word mark DERMOMED – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the goods at issue – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-230/25.
• CELEX:62024TJ0176: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Feras Al Akhras v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – ‘Family membership’ criterion – Criterion of ‘association with members of the Assad or Makhlouf families’ – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Communication of the restrictive measures – Error of assessment – Proportionality – F
• CELEX:62025TJ0117:           Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 14 janvier 2026.#Atlas Invest BV contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne figurative BioTechUSA – Motif absolu de refus – Caractère descriptif – Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous c), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Obligation de motivation – Article 94, paragraphe 1, du règlement 2017/1001.#Affaire T-117/25.
• CELEX:62025TJ0229: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Ionfarma, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark DESMOMED – Prior national word mark DERMOMED – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the goods at issue – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-229/25.
• CELEX:62023TJ0271_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 4 June 2025.#Alfa-Bank JSC v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Legal persons, entities or bodies involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Russian Government – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Partial inadmissibility – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state re
• CELEX:62024TJ0619: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Applications for the EU word marks Kimkom and Kimsum – Earlier EU word mark KIMPTON – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-619/24.
• CELEX:62024TJ0238_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Bogoljub Karić v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or to restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment.#Case T-238/24.
• CELEX:62024TJ0371_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#La Superquímica, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Monta – Earlier national figurative mark MONTACK – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-371/24.
• CELEX:62024TJ0549:           Urteil des Gerichts (Erste Kammer) vom 14. Januar 2026.#Schönegger Käse-Alm GmbH gegen Amt der Europäischen Union für geistiges Eigentum.#Unionsmarke – Verfahren zur Erklärung des Verfalls – Unionswortmarke Rebell – Erklärung des teilweisen Verfalls – Entscheidung, die nach Aufhebung einer früheren Entscheidung durch das Gericht ergangen ist – Art. 72 Abs. 6 der Verordnung (EU) 2017/1001 – Unterbrechung des Verfahrens – Art. 106 Abs. 1 Buchst. b der Verordnung 2017/1001 – Wiederaufnahme des Verfahrens – Art. 72 Abs. 1 der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) 2018/625 – Antrag auf Erklärung des Verfalls – Art. 63 Abs. 1 der Verordnung 2017/1001 – Zustellung an Vertreter – Art. 60 Abs. 1 der Delegierten Verordnung 2018/625.#Rechtssache T-549/24.
• CELEX:62025TJ0009:           Urteil des Gerichts (Achte Kammer) vom 14. Januar 2026.#Kct GmbH & Co. KG gegen Amt der Europäischen Union für geistiges Eigentum.#Unionsmarke – Anmeldung einer Unionsmarke, die aus der Bewegung eines Klappfensters besteht – Absolutes Eintragungshindernis – Zeichen, das ausschließlich aus einem charakteristischen Merkmal der Ware besteht, das zur Erreichung einer technischen Wirkung erforderlich ist – Art. 7 Abs. 1 Buchst. e Ziff. ii der Verordnung (EU) 2017/1001.#Rechtssache T-9/25.
• CELEX:62023TJ1154_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 14 May 2025.#Taxolutions BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark TAXMARC – Earlier EU figurative mark X TAXMAN – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Relevant public – Conceptual similarity.#Case T-1154/23.
• CELEX:62025TJ0064: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Lisa Leone and Others v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Leone – Relative ground for invalidity – Right to an earlier name under Austrian law – Article 60(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-64/25.
• CELEX:62024TO0568_INF: Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 September 2025.#VTB Bank PAO v European Central Bank.#Case T-568/24.