Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62025CJ0202_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#HG v Minister van Asiel en Migratie.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Roermond.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals – Directive 2008/115/EC – Revocation of subsidiary protection status – Public order – Principle of non-refoulement – Possibility of adopting a return decision.#Case C-202/25.

0 0

CELEX:62025CJ0216: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 June 2026.#ZN v GSP Offshore SRL.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Transfers of undertakings – Safeguarding of employees’ rights – Directive 2001/23/EC – Article 3(1) – Transfer to the transferee of the obligations arising from a contract of employment existing on the date of the transfer of the undertaking – Option for Member States to provide for the joint and several liability of the transferor and the transferee – Article 8 – Application of national provisions more favourable to employees – Transfer of the obligation to pay salary entitlements not paid by the transferor – Possibility of applying a national provision making the transfer of an obligation subject to the creditor’s consent.#Case C-216/25.

0 0

CELEX:62025CJ0219:           Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 19 juin 2025.#Ministère public contre KN.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Procédure préjudicielle d’urgence – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Article 67, paragraphe 3, et article 82, paragraphe 1, TFUE – Coopération judiciaire en matière pénale – Demande d’extradition émanant d’un pays tiers – Citoyen de l’Union – Articles 18 et 21 TFUE – Décision antérieure prise par un autre État membre de refuser l’extradition en raison d’un risque sérieux d’atteinte aux droits fondamentaux – Article 19, paragraphe 2, de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Droit de la personne réclamée de ne pas être extradée vers un État où il existe un risque sérieux qu’elle soit soumise à la torture ou à des traitements in

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62025CJ0219_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#Ministère public v KN.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Montpellier.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Area of freedom, security and justice – Article 67(3) and Article 82(1) TFEU – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Extradition request from a third country – EU citizen – Articles 18 and 21 TFEU – Previous decision of another Member State refusing extradition due to a serious risk of infringement of fundamental rights – Article 19(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right of the requested person not to be extradited to a State where there is a serious risk that he or she would be subjected to torture or inhuman o

0 0

CELEX:62025CJ0225_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 May 2026.#KORFIN, s.r.o and SEMPIOLA INVEST LIMITED v SLOVNAFT, a.s.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Company law – Directive 2004/25/EC – Takeover bid – Article 2(1)(a) – Squeeze-out of holders of securities – Offer made by a person controlling the offeree company – Making of the offer following the acquisition of such control – Lack of voluntary nature of the takeover bid.#Case C-225/25.

0 0

CELEX:62025CJ0232: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#Z.R. and Ś. v U. and Z.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 – Jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Article 5(3) – Special jurisdiction in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict – Place where the harmful event occurred or may occur – Natural and legal persons claiming breach of their personality rights as a result of the broadcast of audiovisual content on television and on the internet – International jurisdiction of the courts of a Member State other than the Member State where that content was produced – Place where the damage occurred – Centre of interests of those persons – Content

0 0

CELEX:62025CJ0234: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#Sky Österreich Fernsehen GmbH v Verein für Konsumenteninformation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Consumer rights – Directive 2011/83/EC – Exceptions from the right of withdrawal – Contracts for the supply of digital content which is not supplied on a tangible medium – Article 16(m) – Subscription to a streaming service – Supply of digital services – Offer of a dynamic nature going beyond the mere stable and, as the case may be, continuous provision of specific content.#Case C-234/25.

0 0

CELEX:62025CJ0234_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#Sky Österreich Fernsehen GmbH v Verein für Konsumenteninformation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Consumer rights – Directive 2011/83/EC – Exceptions from the right of withdrawal – Contracts for the supply of digital content which is not supplied on a tangible medium – Article 16(m) – Subscription to a streaming service – Supply of digital services – Offer of a dynamic nature going beyond the mere stable and, as the case may be, continuous provision of specific content.#Case C-234/25.

RSS
First29772978297929802982298429852986Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top