marec 05, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0436: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Skatteverket v Lyko Operations AB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 30a – Supply of goods – Concept of ‘voucher’ – Classification – Customer loyalty programme in the form of points awarded on the basis of previous purchases – Points which may be redeemed for products of low value.#Case C-436/24.
maj 01, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0436_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Skatteverket v Lyko Operations AB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 30a – Supply of goods – Concept of ‘voucher’ – Classification – Customer loyalty programme in the form of points awarded on the basis of previous purchases – Points which may be redeemed for products of low value.#Case C-436/24.
november 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0445: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 November 2025.#MS Amlin Insurance SE v (W)onderweg VZW.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive (EU) 2015/2302 – Package travel and linked travel arrangements – Article 3(6) – Concept of ‘traveller’ – Legal person who has concluded a travel contract for its members.#Case C-445/24.
januar 23, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0445_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 November 2025.#MS Amlin Insurance SE v (W)onderweg VZW.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive (EU) 2015/2302 – Package travel and linked travel arrangements – Article 3(6) – Concept of ‘traveller’ – Legal person who has concluded a travel contract for its members.#Case C-445/24.
april 24, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0446: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#Freie Hansestadt Bremen v DT.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Directive 2008/115/EC – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Article 11(2) – Entry ban – Duration – National legislation which requires, in principle, an indefinite ban on entry and stay in certain cases – Terrorist threat.#Case C-446/24.
julij 15, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0446_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#Freie Hansestadt Bremen v DT.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Freie Hansestadt Bremen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Directive 2008/115/EC – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Article 11(2) – Entry ban – Duration – National legislation which requires, in principle, an indefinite ban on entry and stay in certain cases – Terrorist threat.#Case C-446/24.
maj 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0447: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 May 2026.#Staatsanwaltschaft Berlin v SO.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty – Grounds for non-recognition and non-enforcement – Article 9(1)(i) – Person concerned who did not appear in person at the trial resulting in his or her conviction – Exceptions – Mandate conferred by the person concerned on a legal counsellor to defend that person at his or her trial and accept service of documents addressed to that person – Information regarding the scheduled date of the hearing and place of that trial – Voluntary and unequivocal wai
maj 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0447_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 May 2026.#Staatsanwaltschaft Berlin v SO.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty – Grounds for non-recognition and non-enforcement – Article 9(1)(i) – Person concerned who did not appear in person at the trial resulting in his or her conviction – Exceptions – Mandate conferred by the person concerned on a legal counsellor to defend that person at his or her trial and accept service of documents addressed to that person – Information regarding the scheduled date of the hearing and place of that trial – Voluntary and unequivocal
september 04, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0451: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#Kwizda Pharma GmbH v Landeshauptmann von Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medicinal products – Product which may fall within the definition of ‘medicinal product’ and within the definition of ‘product covered by other Community legislation’ – Applicable legal framework – Directive 2001/83/EC – Article 2(2) – Rule of precedence – Scope – Effectiveness – Procedural autonomy of the Member States – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation.#Case C-451/24.
april 10, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0451_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#Kwizda Pharma GmbH v Landeshauptmann von Wien.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medicinal products – Product which may fall within the definition of ‘medicinal product’ and within the definition of ‘product covered by other Community legislation’ – Applicable legal framework – Directive 2001/83/EC – Article 2(2) – Rule of precedence – Scope – Effectiveness – Procedural autonomy of the Member States – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation.#Case C-451/24.