januar 13, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023TA0160: Case T-160/23: Judgment of the General Court of 6 November 2024 – VO v Commission (Civil service – Officials – Demotion for incompetence – Article 51(1)(a) of the Staff Regulations – Internal implementing provisions for Article 51 of the Staff Regulations – Support and remediation programme – Coaching plan – Liability – Material and non-material harm)
junij 03, 2024 0 30 CELEX:62023TA0161: Case T-161/23: Judgment of the General Court of 10 April 2024 – Schönegger Käse-Alm v EUIPO – Jumpseat3D plus Germany (Rebell)
avgust 25, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023TA0163: Case T-163/23: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2025 – Fritz Egger and Others v ECHA (Melamine) (REACH – Substances of very high concern – Establishment of a candidate list for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Decision identifying melamine as a substance meeting the criteria laid down for inclusion in the list – Right to be heard – Principle of good administration – Article 57 of Regulation No 1907/2006 – Manifest error of assessment – Ultra vires – Proportionality)
april 22, 2024 0 53 CELEX:62023TA0164: Case T-164/23: Judgment of the General Court of 28 February 2024 – Drinks Prod v EUIPO – Wolff and Illg (IGISAN)
avgust 18, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023TA0165: Case T-165/23: Judgment of the General Court of 2 July 2025 – Arkema France v Commission (Commercial policy – Dumping – Imports of fatty acids originating in Indonesia – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Article 9(1) of Regulation (UE) 2016/1036 – Continuation of the investigation after withdrawal of the complaint – Article 1(1) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Article 3(6) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Injury analysis – Article 21(1) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Union interest analysis – Manifest error of assessment – Error of law)
oktober 21, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023TA0166: Case T-166/23: Judgment of the General Court of 4 September 2024 – Dekoback v EUIPO – DecoPac (DECOPAC) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark DECOPAC – Absolute ground for invalidity – No bad faith – Article 51(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
avgust 25, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023TA0167: Case T-167/23: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2025 – LAT Nitrogen Piesteritz and Cornerstone v ECHA (Melamine) (REACH – Substances of very high concern – Establishment of a candidate list for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Decision identifying melamine as a substance meeting the criteria laid down for inclusion in the list – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Ultra vires – Article 57 of Regulation No 1907/2006 – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality – Precautionary principle – Misuse of powers)
julij 22, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023TA0170: Case T-170/23: Judgment of the General Court of 12 June 2024 – Amstel Brouwerij v EUIPO – Anheuser-Busch (ULTRA) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark ULTRA – Absolute ground for invalidity – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – EUIPO’s Guidelines for examination)
april 08, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023TA0172: Case T-172/23: Judgment of the General Court of 21 February 2024 — Dendiki v EUIPO — D-Market (hepsiburada) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark hepsiburada — Absolute ground for invalidity — Bad faith — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
marec 25, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023TA0173: Case T-173/23: Judgment of the General Court of 31 January 2024 — Simpson Performance Products v EUIPO — Freundlieb (BANDIT) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark BANDIT — Earlier non-registered word mark BANDIT — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 2(2)(g) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 — Identification of the goods and services on which the opposition is based)