Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0262: Cases T-262/21 and T-256/22: Judgment of the General Court of 20 December 2023 — Yanukovych v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Misappropriation of Ukrainian State funds — Article 1(1) of Decision 2014/119/CFSP — Article 3(1) of Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0263: Cases T-263/21 and T-257/22: Judgment of the General Court of 20 December 2023 — Yanukovych v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Misappropriation of Ukrainian State funds — Article 1(1) of Decision 2014/119/CFSP — Article 3(1) of Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection)

0 2

CELEX:62021TA0264: Case T-264/21: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Établissement Amra v EUIPO — eXpresio (Shape of a rebound shoe) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU three-dimensional mark — Shape of a rebound shoe — Absolute ground for refusal — Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result — Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Presence of word elements — Lack of essential non-functional characteristics)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0268(01): Case T-268/21 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2026 – Ryanair v Commission (Italy; aid scheme; COVID-19) (State aid – Italian air transport market – Compensation scheme for airlines with an Italian operating licence – Decision not to raise any objections – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Article 107(2)(b) TFEU – Eligibility condition relating to a minimum remuneration requirement for employees whose home base is located in Italy – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of non-discrimination – Free provision of services – Freedom of establishment – Assessment of damage – Causal link – Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 593/2008)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0269: Case T-269/21: Judgment of the General Court of 26 July 2023 — Arctic Paper Grycksbo v Commission (Environment — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading — National implementing measures — Transitional free allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances — Decision to exclude an installation exclusively using biomass — Duty of diligence — Right to be heard — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Equal treatment — Legitimate expectations — Plea of illegality — Paragraph 1 of Annex I to Directive 2003/87)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0271: Case T-271/21: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Ortis v Commission (Consumer protection – Substances prohibited, restricted or under EU scrutiny – Article 8(1) and (2) of, and Annex III to, Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 – Prohibition and placing under scrutiny of certain substances and preparations containing hydroxyanthracene derivatives – First and second entries in Article 1(1), and first and second entries in Article 1(2), of Regulation (EU) 2021/468 – Definition of substance, ingredient and preparations – Error of law)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0272: Case T-272/21: Judgment of the General Court of 5 July 2023 — Puigdemont i Casamajó and Others v Parliament (Institutional law — Member of the Parliament — Privileges and immunities — Decision to waive parliamentary immunity — Article 9 of Protocol No° 7 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union — Competence of the authority that issued the request for waiver of immunity — Legal certainty — Manifest error of assessment — Scope of the Parliament’s review — Procedure for examining the request for the waiver of immunity — Rights of the defence — Impartiality)

RSS
First12871288128912901292129412951296Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top