Admin MPS / četrtek, 13. avgust 2026 / Categories: Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI) CELEX:62025CO0564_INF: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#FL v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation and European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Case C-564/25 P. CELEX:62025CO0564: Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 12 mars 2026.#FL contre Agence de l’Union européenne pour la coopération judiciaire en matière pénale (Eurojust) et Agence de l’Union européenne pour la coopération des services répressifs (Europol).#Pourvoi – Article 181 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Coopération des autorités de police et autres services répressifs des États membres – Article 340 TFUE – Règlement (UE) 2016/794 – Article 50, paragraphe 1 – Responsabilité non contractuelle de l’Agence de l’Union européenne pour la coopération des services répressifs (Europol) – Prétendu traitement illicite de données à caractère personnel transmises à Europol par des autorités nationales – Réalité du préjudice prétendument subi – Pourvoi en partie manifesteme CELEX:62025CO0565: Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 12 mars 2026.#CW contre Agence de l’Union européenne pour la coopération judiciaire en matière pénale (Eurojust) et Agence de l’Union européenne pour la coopération des services répressifs (Europol).#Pourvoi – Article 181 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Coopération des autorités de police et autres services répressifs des États membres – Article 340 TFUE – Règlement (UE) 2016/794 – Article 50, paragraphe 1 – Responsabilité non contractuelle de l’Agence de l’Union européenne pour la coopération des services répressifs (Europol) – Prétendu traitement illicite de données à caractère personnel transmises à Europol par des autorités nationales – Réalité du préjudice prétendument subi – Pourvoi manifestement non fon Print 1 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62024CJ0899_INF: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 April 2026.#HG v European Commission.#Case C-899/24 P. CELEX:62025TO0214_INF: Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 February 2026.#IR v Council of the European Union.#Civil service – Officials – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Downgrading in the same function group – Unauthorised engagement in outside activities – Article 10 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-214/25. CELEX:62023TJ0328_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 February 2026.#Radical-Consulting UG and Others v European High-Performance Computing Joint Undertaking.#Research and technological development – Horizon Europe Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027) – High-performance computing applications – Call for proposals with a view to the award of a grant – Decision rejecting a proposal – Decision rejecting the request for an evaluation review – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of transparency – Equal treatment – Article 30 of Regulation (EU) 2021/695.#Case T-328/23. CELEX:62025CO0642_INF: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 March 2026.#Dragoș Ionuț Onescu v European Commission.#Case C-642/25 P. CELEX:62025CO0368_INF: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 24 February 2026.#A. A. v C.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije.#Case C-368/25. CELEX:62025CO0868_INF: Order of the Court of 30 April 2026.#European Lotto and Betting ltd. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Appeal failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-868/25 P. CELEX:62024TJ0669_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 March 2026.#Opticoelectron Group AD v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Case T-669/24. CELEX:62024CJ0789_INF: Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#International Management Group (IMG) contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Responsabilité non contractuelle – Réglementation financière de l’Union – Exécution du budget de l’Union européenne en gestion indirecte par une organisation internationale – Décision refusant à une entité la reconnaissance du statut d’organisation internationale – Préjudice matériel – Perte de chance de conclure avec la Commission européenne des conventions de délégation selon le mode de la gestion indirecte en qualité d’organisation internationale et de percevoir une contribution visant à couvrir les frais administratifs induits – Lien de causalité – Réalité et étendue du préjudice.#Affaire C-789/24 P. CELEX:62021TJ0359_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 March 2026.#ClientEarth AISBL v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents concerning the active substances mancozeb and cypermethrin – Individual positions of the Member States in the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed – Partial refusal of access – Article 4(2) and (3) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process – Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings – Overriding public interest.#Case T-359/21. CELEX:62024TJ0465_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 February 2026.#FA v European Investment Bank.#Case T-465/24. CELEX:62025CJ0346_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#FIBO MARKETS Limited v J.P.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Conflicts of laws – Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 (Rome I) – Applicable law – Consumer contracts – Exceptions – Financial contracts for differences (CFDs) – Rights and obligations which constitute a financial instrument – Process of setting prices for CFDs – Difference between the exchange rate deviation accepted in the consumer’s order and the exchange rate deviation in the transaction executed.#Case C-346/25. CELEX:62026TO0310: Order of the President of the General Court of 12 August 2026.#TB v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Application for interim measures – Civil service – Member of the temporary staff – Fixed-term contract – Termination of the contract – Application for suspension of operation and interim measures – Lack of urgency.#Case T-310/26 R. CELEX:62026CO0067_INF: Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#Napag Italia S.r.l. contre Agenzia delle Entrate – Direzione Regionale del Lazio.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Absence de mise en œuvre du droit de l’Union – Incompétence manifeste de la Cour.#Affaire C-67/26. CELEX:62024CJ0556_INF: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#Deutsche Bank AG and BHW Bausparkasse AG v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Single supervisory mechanism – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the European Central Bank (ECB) – Article 4 – Setting of prudential requirements – Article 16 – Risk linked to irrevocable payment commitments (IPCs) given in favour of deposit guarantee schemes or resolution funds – Deduction in full from the Common Equity Tier 1 capital of the sums paid as collateral for the IPCs – Discretion of the ECB – Judicial review.#Case C-556/24 P. CELEX:62026TO0031_INF: Order of the President of the General Court of 30 March 2026.#Ecolog Deutschland GmbH v European Commission.#Case T-31/26 R. CELEX:62024TJ0594_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 March 2026.#Compass-Datenbank GmbH v European Commission.#Case T-594/24. CELEX:62025TJ0006_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 March 2026.#QI v European Commission.#Case T-6/25. CELEX:62026TO0294: Ordonnance du président du Tribunal du 11 août 2026.#SX contre Parlement européen.#Référé – Réglementation concernant les frais et indemnités des députés au Parlement – Indemnité d’assistance parlementaire – Recouvrement des sommes indûment versées – Demande de sursis à exécution – Défaut d’urgence.#Affaire T-294/26 R. CELEX:62024CJ0544_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 April 2026.#,,Nekilnojamojo turto valdymas“ BUAB v Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 273 – Article 49(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Obligations deemed necessary to ensure the correct collection of VAT and to prevent fraud – National legislation providing for a set of rules in respect of default interest relating to VAT arrears – Charging of default interest – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-544/24. CELEX:32017R2454R(03) Comments are only visible to subscribers.