Related articles

• OJ:C_202604511: Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by the the District Court of Reykjavik dated 30 March 2026 in the case of Íslenska gámafélagið ehf. v Sorpa bs. (Case E-6/26)
• OJ:C_202604512: Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by the Supreme Court of Norway dated 24 April 2026 in the case of Hemla Africa Holding AS & Others v Philia E&P Holding (Ireland) Limited (Case E-8/26)
• CELEX:62025CO0851_INF: Order of the Court of 9 June 2026.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-851/25 P.
• CELEX:62025CO0883_INF: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 May 2026.#María del Pilar Galindo Giralt v Kingdom of Spain.#Case C-883/25.
• CELEX:62025CO0502_INF: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#„YETTEL BULGARIA“ EAD v FB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Case C-502/25.
• CELEX:62024CJ0518_INF: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#European Commission v Hellenic Republic.#Case C-518/24.
• CELEX:62025CO0850_INF: Order of the Court of 9 June 2026.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-850/25 P.
• CELEX:32026D1947: Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1947 of 21 April 2026 on the signing and conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Djibouti on the status of the European Union-led forces in the Republic of Djibouti in the framework of the European Union maritime security operation to safeguard freedom of navigation in relation to the Red Sea crisis (EUNAVFOR ASPIDES)
• CELEX:32009L0069R(01)
• CELEX:62025CO0582(01)_INF: Order of the General Court (Single Judge), M. Biltgen François of 4 May 2026.#Alireza Malekzadeh Arasteh v European Commission.#Interim relief – Appeal – Application for interim measures – Dismissal of the main action – No need to adjudicate.#Case C-582/25 P-R.
• CELEX:32026R0382R(04)
• CELEX:62026CN0517: Case C-517/26, Aranzadi La Ley: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 21 May 2026 – Aranzadi La Ley S.A.U. v VLex Networks, S.L.
• CELEX:62026CA0182: Case C-182/26 PPU, Hardeker: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Haarlem – Netherlands) – DL v Minister van Asiel en Migratie (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Immigration policy – Return of third-country nationals staying illegally in a Member State – Directive 2008/115/EC – Article 3(3) – Country of destination – Article 5 – Principle of non-refoulement – Article 15 – Detention for the purpose of removal – Review of compliance with the conditions governing lawfulness – Time at which compliance with the principle of non-refoulement is examined – Return decision indicating several potential countries of destination – Detention measure
• CELEX:62026TN0415: Case T-415/26: Action brought on 2 July 2026 – Molchanov v Council
• CELEX:62026TN0383: Case T-383/26: Action brought on 19 June 2026 – TZ v EUAA
• CELEX:62024TA0654: Case T-654/24: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2026 – Attilah v EUIPO – Bella Tawziaa II and Groupe Bellakhdar (4011 B552) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark 4011 B552 – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
• CELEX:62026CN0726: Case C-726/26 P: Appeal brought on 1 July 2026 by Red Bull GmbH, Red Bull France SASU and Red Bull Nederland BV against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, sitting with five Judges) delivered on 22 April 2026 in Case T-682/24, Red Bull GmbH and Others v Commission
• CELEX:62026CA0024: Case C-24/26 PPU, Casotta: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 April 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte d’appello di Roma – Italy) – Criminal proceedings against CV (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2012/29/EU – Minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime – Articles 6, 10 and 18 – Right to receive information about the case and right to be heard – National legislation providing for an extraordinary remedy, whereby a person convicted in absentia may have a conviction which has become final quashed – No recognition of the right of the victim to be informed of the application for th
• CELEX:62025TB0844: Case T-844/25 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 22 June 2026 – Biohaven Bioscience Ireland and Biohaven Therapeutics v EMA (Interim relief – Medicinal products for human use – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Withdrawal of the application for marketing authorisation for Dazluma – Publication of the assessment report – Application for suspension of operation – Prima facie case – Urgency – Weighing up of interests)
• CELEX:62022CA0769: Case C-769/22: Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 21 April 2026 – Commission v Hungary (Values of the European Union) (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – National legislation introducing restrictions in relation to deviation from the self-identity corresponding to the sex assigned at birth, gender reassignment, or homosexuality, with a view to protecting children – Directives 2000/31/EC, 2006/123/EC, 2010/13/EU – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Restrictions on sex education – Principle of non-discrimination – Values of the European Union as enshrined in Article 2 TEU – Reliance on a breach of those values in an action for failure to fulfil obligations – Articles 1, 7, 11 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – P